9/11 Terrorist Trials – Defense Attorney States Attack Was Not Murder !!!
Thursday, January 21st, 2010 at
3:21 pm
Bill O’Reilly interviews a 9/11 terrorist defense attorney, Scott Fenstermaker, regarding his perspective on his representing the 9/11 attackers. Scott Fenstermaker states that the 9/11 attack was…
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
- Related Online Generic pills posts on 9/11
- 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America » Blog Archive » Buck …
- Second-half woes burn Charger boys basketball at HJ Sports Blog
- How do I turn the 911 conspiracy theory into a social issue? | 911 …
what a idiot American government is so stupid
ImUnlikeAnyOtherYou don’t seem unique to me.It is clear to this Fox viewer (and I must assume you are one, too because you saw this, so are you too dumb, as well?) exactly what he was saying. It is the quibbling, the inability to call murderers what they are, the effort to justify the murderers because America makes them mad, that is so ugly.They are terrorists not people who broke our law. And anyone unable to assert that the US is the greatest country on earth is utterly insane.
He did not state the “attack was not murder” he stated that it is up the the jury to decide. Ugh.
most fox news watchers are too dumb to realize that.
For this dummy, plse explain why this attny quibbled on the number killed? If you actually listened he does dispute that they were murdered. The argument will be the terrorists killed in battle, thus not murder, right? Soldiers don’t get prosecuted for killiing on the battlefield, ay. I was in GTMO. I saw 2 of the 5 at hearings. They have no respect for the def attny’s; don’t want them and can’t wait to come and manipulate the NY papers. A circus it will be until a bldg gets blown up.
To edit my comment, I made it make no sense. Try this instead.This is what the mindset of moral equivalency leads to – nit picking, finding fault with this country instead of our enemies. He is an ungrateful snob and I wish he would live under Sharia law somewhere where he would not be able to look so good or be a pest against us.He had around fifteen times to give an honest, personal straight answer to a straight question and refused to. If he ever did that, he would prove he is a weasel .
This is what the mindset of moral equivalency leads to – nit picking, finding fault with this country instead of our enemies, thinking anyone whom we consider an enemy. Either way he is an ungrateful snob and I wish he would live under Sharia law somewhere where he would not be able to look so good or be a pest against us.He had around fifteen times to give an honest, personal straight answer to a straight question and refused to. .
oreilly should have raped him!!
@3eemy Only the FCC stopped him from saying what he and all of us WANTED him to say….You’re a fucking weasel loser piece of shit aren’t you? Yeah O’Reilly should have still taken him to task more than he did.