How often are a criminal defense attorney’s clients guilty?
Thursday, May 6th, 2010 at
7:37 pm
While this question might be difficult (maybe impossible) to answer, I was curious as to a vague percentage? I’m trying to get a feel for the ethical issues of the occupation.
In other words, would you think that a crim. defense attorney’s clients are predominately guilty of the crimes they are accused of? Is it even possible for a lawyer to only defend whom they believe to be innocent?
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
- Related posts on attorney’s
- Jessika Tate, Attorney At Law – Tulsa, OK | Attorneys Personal Injury
- Searching for Los Angeles Employment Attorneys 101 | Casuals …
- Choosing A Buy Generic Cialis Online Personal Injury Attorney Is Hard Work | Attorneys …
the “Criminal” in crim. defense attorney isn’t there for show unfortunately
so even if once in a long while there happens to be a innocent client the majority are guilty, as far as the defense is concerned most lawyers don’t even ask wheat her the client is guilty or not, this helps them to look just at the evidence thereby eliminating any emotional bias
The answer is, that it doesn’t matter. If you’re in it to defend only innocent clients you won’t get very far. The job of a criminal defense attorney is to hold the State to it’s burden of proof by providing the best defense possible for their client, regardless of guilt or innocence.
Imagine a system in which lawyers were ethically bound to defend only those they thought truly innocent. Anyone charged with a crime under such a system would face an enormous initial hurdle of convincing some attorney that they are worthy of representation, and many would face the justice system without representation and surely be convicted. The practical result of such a system would be that lawyers, collectively, would have a much greater impact on the determination of guilt or innocence, than judges or juries. Is that what we want?
I understand all the ethical arguments, and the mindless, bumper-sticker lawyer bashing that goes on. And in many cases there is some justification for it. The challenge is to propose a better alternative.